There are 8 veeps in Parti Gerakan, some are elected while others are appointed by the central committee (in reality the President) or by virtue of the constitution (ie youth and wanita chiefs). So far one died, one goes into oblivion, and now one suspended. Is it a bad omen position or what? Not really, as currently the remaining vice-presidents in the party are in great shape. Although some are of ‘yes-men’, invited outsider, or a mere puppet veep, such leaders are still required to set an exemplary to the members of the party. Regardless of their age, political experience, loyalty, educational and professional qualifications, except for the title, a veep play almost no role in the party. So, what is the responsibility of a veep in Gerakan?
In the context of a corporation, a veep usually report to the board of directors or the CEO. A run in the mill veep executes everything the CEO asks for but makes decision on the relatively small tasks that the CEO usually doesn’t bother with. Nothing in the party’s constitution states clearly of their formal powers and role except in Article 63, where it is stated that a veep ’shall assist the President and the Deputy and shall when authorised by the President, in the absence of the Deputy exercise any of the powers of the President’. To me, it is more proper to consider their function as proposers, confidants and envoys to the President but often they rather speak in agreement and nod their heads – prefer to enjoy the patronage while preserving their self-interest. Although a veep can be perceived as an obedient follower, there are also others who are willing to take harderline stands on issues to ensure support of the grassroots while deflecting partisan criticsm away from the President. (Am I talking about Huan? Yalah, one of them…). Of course, a veep needs not always blow the trumpet as if the President makes wrong decision all the times or just to prove his/her capability.
Nonetheless many will expect as vice-presidents, they are asked not only to lead within their capacity but to be ready in the event something happens. Therefore to those who have the ability to sublimate their own views and attitudes, about somethings to some extent, is a remarkable attribute. Whatever it is, intra democracy should be the way to move forward for the party. The party is not only about the adviser or the president but the whole family. Maybe not but at the very least, members’ contributions and efforts must be appreciated and worthwhile with the support of the top leaderships. Again my same old story: there are many routes leading to the same destination, just ensure that it is worth the journey.
andyyong
Recent Comments