Demo Pemuda Gerakan terhadap MP Sri Gading

Malaysiakini: Kira-kira 50 anggota Pemuda Gerakan berdemonstrasi membantah kenyataan ahli parlimen BN Seri Gading Datuk Mohamad Aziz yang meminta presiden parti itu Tan sri Koh Tsu Koon berundur daripada kabinet atas alasan gagal menunjukkan prestasi yang baik.

Diketuai timbalannya, Oh Teong Keong, mereka berkumpul di lobi bangunan PGRM di Cheras – tempat Gerakan mengadakan persidangan tahunannya.

Mereka turut membawa beberapa sepanduk dan kain rentang, selain melaungkan jeritan anti-Mohamad.

Kumpulan itu menuntut BN supaya mengambil tindakan tegas terhadap Mohamad kerana didakwa membuat kekacauaan dalam parti sendiri.

Ditemui media selepas demonstrasi itu, Oh berkata, dewan tertinggi BN patut mengambil tindakan tegas terhadap wakil rakyat Umno itu.

“Umno dan Gerakan sama-sama parti komponen dalam BN. Mohamad tidak patut mengguris perasaan rakan sendiri.

“Kami harap dewan tertinggi BN dalam mengambil tindakan terhadap beliau,” katanya.

Sementara itu, bercakap dalam sidang media selepas merasmikan persidangan tahunan sayap Gerakan itu, timbalan presiden parti itu, Datuk Chang Ko Youn meminta ahli parti itu supaya tidak terlalu memikirkan kenyataan Mohamad kerana banyak lagi isu lain yang perlu ditangani.

Bercakap dalam sesi yang sama, ketua wanitanya, Datuk Tan Lian Hoe pula mengingatkan supaya semua ahli dalam komponen BN tidak mewujudkan persengketaan terbuka sesama parti dalam BN.

“Apa terjadi dalam parti komponen BN akan jejaskan parti lain. Sebagai keluarga besar, tindak-tanduk harus dijaja. Jangan berkelahi secara terbuka,” katanya

Reaksi Dr Koh

Sementara itu, Bernama melaporkan Dr Koh berkata, beliau tidak tercalar dengan gesaan Mohamad itu.

“Jawapan saya kepada beliau ialah tidak. Itu adalah salah. Kami tidak akan terganggu. Kami komited terhadap apa yang kami mahu lakukan.

“Ini merupakan tempoh yang amat penting di mana kami perlu bekerja bersama-sama,” katanya.

Menurut Dr Koh lagi, di bawah kerajaan baru pentadbiran Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, berlaku banyak perubahan dan juga cabaran dan seseorang perlu bertanya bagaimana seseorang itu dapat menyumbang kepada proses perubahan itu.

Koh menyifatkan kenyataan Mohamad sebagai “kuasa negatif” dan menegaskan ia bercanggah dengan semangat BN, tetapi menurutnya beliau yakin dengan sokongan semua anggota parti, kuasa positif akhirnya akan mengatasi kuasa negatif itu.

“Sudah tentu, akan ada kuasa negatif yang tidak bersetuju…dalam BN, dalam kalangan parti-parti komponen, malahan dalam Gerakan. Mereka akan terus menyalahkan pihak lain,” katanya semasa merasmikan Perhimpunan Agung Anggota Seumur Hidup Gerakan hari ini.

MP Sri Gading, jangan jadi hantu pantat!

Sebagai seorang ahli Parlimen, beliau harus bersikap profesional dan berdebat isu-isu kepentingan rakyat dan negara. Soal mencabar perangai seseorang ahli politik itu adalah perkara biasa tapi siapakah si Aziz itu untuk mengarahkan Tan Sri Koh berundur sebagai Menteri? Yang paling tidak kena adalah beliau nampaknya seperti bersepakat dengan Lim Kit Siang untuk menentang rakan BN sendiri. Adakah ini semangat BN? Teresa Kok kata dalam pembangkang ada ’shit-stirrer’, nampaknya dalam BN pun ada. Mengampu atau tidak, itu adalah subjektif, kalau hantu pantat tak puas hati, kenapa tidak menghadapi Koh? Pergilah jaga hal rumah sendiri sebelum nak menyibuk hal orang lain.

Dalam perkara lain, saya berharap kerajaan akan mengkaji semula keputusan 5% RPGT dikenakan atas jualan hartanah tanpa kira tempoh kepunyaan. Ini adalah tidak adil terhadap mereka yang sudah lama membeli sesebuah rumah persendirian, contoh melebihi 10 atau 20 tahun dahulu. Sudah tentu harganya akan banyak menguntungkan, adakah wajar untuk mengenakan cukai atas keuntungan tersebut. Sebuah rumah banglo di Bangsar adalah berharga lebih kurang 200 ribu pada tahun 70 an, kini di anggaran 2 juta, adalah 5% akan dikenakan atas keuntungan 1.8 juta? Tujuan utama RPGT adalah untuk mengelakkan pembeli spekulatif dan bukan mereka yang benar-benar menghuni begitu lama.

Kebenaran DUN Perak

Cakap-cakap politik di restoran mamak, Ipoh:

Ali: Apa macam pagi ni, sidang DUN kita kecoh lagi. Kini pulak slogan “1Malaysia, 2Perak, 3Katak”. Siapakah yang sebenarnya kerajaan yang sah?

Lee: Rakan peguam gua ada jelaskan tapi gua masih tak faham, banyak sangat isu undang-undang, perlembagaan dan prosedur. Lu orang boleh terangkan secara mudah difahami tak?

Chia: Pakatan itu sore loserslah! Sengaja mahu cari masalah, si Ngeh dan Nga itu tak habis pegang videocam dan handphone untuk tangkap gambar supaya dapat menghangatkan apa-apa isu yang terbangkit. Mereka provoke polis untuk bertindak ganas dan lepas itu putar-belitkan isu sebenar.

Lee: Eh Chia you janganlah pro-BN sangat, bayangkan isteri kamu dirampas orang, tidakkah kamu akan bertungkus lumus untuk mempertahankan kejadian tersebut?

Ali: Hallo Lee, dont make fun of people’s wifelah. Anyway kalau isteri saya begitu senang dirampas, kesetiaannya harus diragui.

Kumar: Saya rasa I boleh explain dengan amnya tapi you orang mesti mahu berfikiran apolitikal iaitu tak boleh ada mentaliti sokong mana-mana pihak BN atau Pakatan. Sebenarnya ini semua soal demokrasi, pada pendapat Pakatan, rakyat telahpun mengundi mereka untuk jadi kerajaan Perak tapi BN merampas kuasa setelah 3 Katak itu lompat. Pada Pakatan, kuasa rakyat adalah demokrasi. Walaupun negara kita tak ada anti-hopping law, pandangan Pakatan adalah seharusnya ada satu pilihanraya lagi, biarkan rakyat untuk membuat keputusan muktamad, tapi BN enggan – kata ramai orang takut kalah.

Ali: Soal demokrasi itu boleh dipertikaikan. 3 Katak itu dengan jelasnya sokong BN, oleh itu BN adalah majoriti di DUN, bukankah itu demokrasi? Memang benar semasa PRU 12, rakyat pilih pembangkang untuk mewakili mereka, tapi adakah mereka pilih parti atau individu? Kalau nak blame, salahkan credibility calon PKR dan DAP lah. Apatah lagi tahun lepas Anwar Ibrahim janji nak ambil alih kerajaan persekutuan dengan adanya 30 Katak tapi gagal. Tambahan lagi dulu semasa PBS di Sabah dikalahkan atas sebab katak juga rancangan Anwar. Pasal pilihanraya, kenapa pulak BN nak dance according to their tune? Selepas keputusan PRU12, BN sebenarnya adalah entiti yang mempunyai majoriti di mana pada masa itu masih tidak ada gabungan Pakatan atau satu entiti politik yang sah. Tapi oleh kerana PR memberitahu Sultan Perak bahawa mereka akan bergabung, Sultan pun membenarkan mereka menjadi kerajaan negeri. Kenapa tak ada orang soal pulak?

Lee: Ya tak ya jugak, kenapa DAP, Pas dan PKR sampai sekarang tak nak register Pakatan? Ideologi yang berbeza? Tak tahu siapa yang harus jadi ketua?

Chia: Jelas mereka adalah a marriage of convenience. Saya ingat pada mulanya si Ngo dari DAP itu pernah boycott Nizar jadi MB kerana parti PAS dapat undian yang paling kurang di antara pembangkang, kini pulak jadi member, semua itu wayang betul!

Kumar: Sebenarnya apa yang dicabar mengenai keesahan BN dijadikan kerajaan baru pun ada meritnya iaitu tidak ada sidang DUN untuk mendapatkan undian majoriti. Saya rasa penasihat atau peguam BN itu tak cukup cekap.

Ali: Itulah permainan rebut-kuasa politik. Pakatan seharusnya terima hakikat mereka secara gentlemen dan bukan huru-harakan keadaan sampai mesyuarat di bawah pokok dan berkelakuan melampui sampai menderhaka Sultan. Mereka harus berusaha to serve the rakyat semoga akan menang di PRU13 nanti.

Lee: I harap rakyat Perak tidak akan beremosi dan bertindak secara rational untuk memutuskan siapakah yang lebih layak untuk memerintah negeri kita. Begitu juga semua ahli politik baik dari BN atau PR, janganlah gila kuasa sehingga kepentingan kita terjejas. Jom baliklah, esok nak kerja…

Kumar: Jom!

Kudos to Transparency

A financial transparency within the government has become much easier to manage than before. The Internet, courages journalist and politicians have provided the public with the possibility of checking how tax payer’s money is distributed among different sectors of our government an addition to how it is being spent. It is reported today in the Star that an estimated RM28 billion losses of public moneys due to non-transparency. Thus hopefully cases like Pempena, PKFZ scandal, AG’s report and government tenders would make public officials accountable and transparent behind the walls of government and improve the quality of the projects.

Transparent procedures include financial disclosure statements, open meetings, budgetary meetings, audits etc. Transparency is a good idea and thanks to the Internet, members of the media, investigative journalist, some individuals (not politicians who have hidden agenda) so that we can now querie all government expenditure to the public. As tax payers, we want to know how the tax money is being used and how every sen is accounted for. However, tranparency is not a new idea; it had been said countlessly in the past. Transparency in politic is the process by which official of the government sets rules and regulation in order to monitor how tax payer’s money exchanges hand within different branches of our government. Without knowing how much money was transmitted originally from initial hand, is not transparency, this would be pretentiousness. Making unjustified or excessive claim that transparency existed when in fact no one truly knows how much money was initially transmitted can no longer exists.

No one is attmpting to debate that transparency within the government never existed before, but in the manner in which Najib has strengthen transparency, no one can say for certain that it has been done before. Ultimately what is crucial next is for the public to see the culprits nailed and surplus in the government coffer.

ISA amendments to be tabled

PUTRAJAYA: Amendments to the Internal Security Act are likely to be tabled in Parliament before the current session ends.

Home Minster Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein outlined five areas under the act that would be looked at extensively by the legislature, as wanted by various groups representing the people involved in several discussions with the ministry.

The issues of concern to them are:

• the rights and treatment of ISA detainees;

• the detention period;

• the home minister’s powers and that the ISA is used for no other purpose but protecting the country’s security and stability;

• that there be no room for allegations of abuse of the ISA or perceptions it is used for political reasons; and,

• the issue of detention without trial.

Hishammuddin said these five issues would be addressed in the first reading of the bill.

He said the bill to be drafted would reflect the views of the rounds of discussion and engagements held.

On the likely amendment to the detention period, which runs up to 60 days currently, he indicated that the consensus so far was for it to be slashed to 30 days.

On the provision for detention without trial under the act which is similar to others like the Patriot Act in the US, Hishammuddin said as in developed countries, the government would ensure it had a sound check and balance to dispel accusations that the act was open to abuse, including for political reasons.

Asked if the amendments would see an end to detentions without trial as provisioned under the act, he said the ministry was considering the many ideas thrown in to strengthen that aspect of the law.

Hishammuddin said he was still open to views in improving the five areas under the act and opinions and suggestions could be forwarded to the ministry’s portal www.ikdn.org or www.ikdn.gov.my, as well as his Facebook account.

Among groups that have had sessions on the ISA with the ministry were non-governmental organisations, academicians and heads of universities, politicians, parliamentarians, youth organisations, the public and enforcement agencies. The ministry will be meeting the Bar Council, women’s organisations and all the Muftis next.

ISA: Repeal, Review or Replace?

I can write pages of why it will be fair, ideal and sensible to abolish the Act rather than reviewing it. I am also in favour to replace it with another law such as anti-Terrorism Act but the ISA has to be repealed first.

ISA Forum: time is 9.00 am NOT 8.00 pm.

Happy Diwali! Keep Cranking!

To all Malaysians who are celebrating Deepavali, best of health and have a joyous moment in life.

Cakap2 Politik II

Faizal: So apa macam dengan politik tempatan, now all eyes on the UMNO general assembly. Betul ke with the abolishment of the quota system and direct vote from division levels can curb money politics?

Rajen: Sikit impact adalah especially for those who still want to play money politics, need to think twice whether is it worthwhile to spend that much.

George: Well at least there is an initiative to reform the party’s tainted culture, we shall analyse…

Faizal: George, your MCA is headless nowlah? Najib sudah hinted both Ong and Chua should leave, echoed by the old man Mahathir and Kim Sai. Who will be the next chief? Are they going to have another party election? Or is the CC going to agree who is to fill the vaccum created by them?

George: Cakap baik-baik eh, I only support non-racial party. The CC will decide soon. Anyway, we can look at different angles from this saga. It may be good for MCA, after all said and done, it is time to choose a leader who has the calibre and accepted by all to truly lead the party into a different ball game. Possible aspirants are Kong Cho Ha, Liow Tiong Lai, Ng Yen Yen, Fong Chan Onn, Ong Ka Chuan or even Wee Ka Siong and Donald Lim. Chua is in favour of the re-election provided it applies to all the CC, otherwise most of them in there are Ong’s ma-chai particularly the appointed ones, 9 of them I think. But I believe this is unlikely as there is no reason for those who were elected to agree.

Ali: Kong and Yen Yen were playing their game very carefully neither seen to support any sides. This iron lady of MCA dreams to become the first woman to lead the party. In the meantime, bolehkah Najib appoints Muhyiddin jadi Pemangku Presiden MCA? After all he is the BN chairman and such arrangement occurred during Neo Yee Pan era where the late Ghaffar Baba was made so.

George: Cannotlah Ali, dulu lain, sekarang lain – the political landscape sudah berubah, ini isu sensitif, sekarang pun sudah orang spin the message that UMNO nak campur tangan which is why Najib is very careful in his statement.

Rajen: BN parties banyak hal lah, actually the public could not be bothered, they are just a laughing stock like what happened in MIC and PPP. Samy is on leave before deciding to resign or not after all the pressures, Najib supports Makkal Sakhti, Murugiah is applying to ROS to reinstate him as the valid PPP president where Kayveas is still furious wanting the return deputy ministerial post. To think about it Gerakan can be the most powerful now beside the taiko UMNO. Koh Tsu Koon, day in day out bersama Najib and the party is a goodie now, sure PM discuss most of his ideas with him.

Faizal: Dont say UMNO is taikolah, we must understand the history and difficulty of our multi-racial society with the Malays dominating the population. However I can agree with you Rajen, for the time being Gerakan is the trusted party in the eye of the PM. Sorry to say that the 2 deputies are either in there because of UMNO or the president, therefore it is not surprise to see them either as a vase or a wimp. As for Koh who has basically achieved everything under the political sky, I hope he has some constructive plans in mind for the people. Sometimes cant really blame the people labelling Gerakan as irrelevant or of no force except to curry flavour with UMNO chiefs.

Ali: Eh, hati-hati cakap, you never know ada spy tahu?…Rajen itu mungkin ahli Gerakan…

George: Tapi that is how people perceives it, a good leader shall has an open heart kan?

Rajen: Oklah I am a Gerakan member tapi dormant. Semua itu tak penting, apa yang crucial adalah prestasi mereka terhadap rakyat. Sementara ini apa yang jelas atau ada impact dari BN is only about the PM’s performance and his 1Malaysia concept. This could also be the reason of Isa’s victory coupled with his popularity in the constituent. MCA, MIC and Gerakan betul-betul got to do something beside wrestling for power or ‘lubang’.

Faizal: What happen to Anwar Ibrahim, sunyi saja? Adakah the allegation about his corrupted funds betul ke?

Ali: Do you realise whenever Nallakaruppan and Azmi speak out about him, he dare not talks much?

George: All I can say is if BN government wants to maintain its improving image, they must be very cautious in whatever policy and decision-making in the future, otherwise the Pakatan politicians will spin and twist the message detrimental to them. Most important is to improve our economy, semua orang ada bisnes, ada kerja dan selamat.

Rajen: Aduhai, tak habis-habis nak cerita politik tempatan, ini hujung tahun pun sampai, I hope our country can really moves forward, jom pergi teh-tarik…

Media Power – Malaysiakini An Opposition Political Tool?

Some say media power is political power. When one talks about democracy, it does not mean that the mass media inherently serves the same. In today’s world, media are vulnerable to manipulative by political influence and economic forces. They are not an agent of democracy. PR supporters would criticise Utusan, the Star etc whereas BN supporters may see Malaysiakini, the Sun, Malaysia Insider etc as a hindrance. The sheer number of comments or voices in those related websites/blogs is not a reliable indicator of a society’s level of freedom. But apparently, for some reasons, it is only the critics who have the time to express themselves.

Unlike sports or entertainment, news in internet reinforces connection between the individual and the surrounding society. Pre-election polls and other opinion surveys evolved to become an ingredient of the political news. The computer literate (majority perceived to be PR supporters) created a new sense of community. Pakatan parties particularly DAP and PKR anticipated this and leave their mark. Such may eventually open to abuse and can undermine democratic order as well as enhance it.

Although freedom of information and press is an important feature in democracy, one must also realise that news and information has no intrinsic value unless embedded in a meaningful context which organises and lends it coherence. News, comments, stories and information can be twisted and spinned. They carry an implicit message.

At the end of the day, what democracy actually requires is implementation of good policies and debate that benefits the people, not so much of information. Malaysians must be able to judge and evaluate rationally. Much of the press or internet site, in its eagerness to attract the public, has become a conduit for the equivalent of junk mail. We should not be misled or manipulated. I hope the media will come to play a larger role in community service and not shaping any political agenda.

Q&A for laymen: Cakap2 Politik.

PR : “Unlike BN, PR parties have equal standing and we work towards a common ground” (DAP MP Charles Santiago)

BN: “PR is obviously a marriage of convenience, with each parties having contrasting ideologies. If PR is truly united, why is it so difficult and taking so long for them to register their coalition? Think about it”.

Ah Beng: “Although with different objectives, everbody knowlah Pakatan just pakat to hantam BN, what to do? PR was smart to spread their message through internet and e-media effectively. They are able to sing the song that please the people. Most urbanites and youngters support their ideals even if it tastes like shit. But ya loh why they dont want to form the Pakatan coalition officially? Perhaps worry of a possible conflict who to head?”

Ali: “Aiyah all politicians are the same, they will play their strategy to win the game. At the end of the day, it is to convince the rakyats or voters. I hope the rakyats will judge them in a rational manner and not emotionally”.

——————————

PR: “UMNO will never change. They are still playing the patronism and cronyism politics. They are adamant to learn from mistake. Just look at the recent selection, after picking a tainted candidate the last round, now put another candidate like Isa Samad again. Others affirming the same are Ali Rustam and Khir Toyo”.

BN: “Isa is a candidate of the people’s choice. We’d did our ground works before picking him. He was punished for his wrongdoings previously”.

Ah Seng: “A leopard will never change its spot. Although it is difficult to kill off UMNO, if the PM is not brave to chop off those warlords and napoleans, UMNO is killing themselves, no need for PR to do anything”.

Muthu: “Like that ah, so why is it they are convinced that Anwar Ibrahim has repented? Why is it they can accept Zaid Ibrahim who was also found guilty of money politics previously?”

——————————————–

PR: “Government agencies such as the police force, judiciary, EC and MACC are BN’s dogs. They practise double standards and always suppressing and oppressing PR politicians, do you call that a free and democratic society?”

BN: “There may be incidents that the people perceived the public officers of being bias and one-sided. However most of the time they are being provoked and lured to create a negative impression to the people. If PR has proof, a concrete one, there is no reason justice cannot prevails. False allegations and accusations are equally unfair to BN government. The judges today are of high integrity, judgments are made in favour of both sides. The MACC actually investigated more UMNO/BN politicians than PR, it is just there is nothing to shout about by calling the press media. PR will always call up the reporters once MACC officers visit their respective premises, in order to highlight that: “You see, they are ambushing PR again? In TBH’s case there are many possibilities that lead to his death. Just because a Singh lawyer who knows how to act fierce and stir up the issue doesnt mean MACC is the culprit. About the recent EC’s act at Teluk Kemang, the law in the Election Offences Act clearly states that non-contesting party cannot put up their posters/flags – PR should form an official coalition. Undeniably PR is good at spinning the news so that the public will not suspect any shortcomings on their part”.

Ah Wong: “Ok, ok maybe PR played their game better since the last GE. Isn’t that how an opposition should perform effectively, to be a watchdog against any unfair act and policies by the government. Anyhow we cannot really blame the PR even if it is a false accusation. BN has made people to distrust them particularly with their blatant corrupt practice. The only thing I am disappointed is some of this PR politicians are still behaving like the olden days opposition not realising that they are already the state governments of the day. My inkling tells me that TBH’s death has something got to do with Ronnie’s involvment with the underworld. I am pretty sure the DAP in Selangor has some dealings with the underworld, otherwise why is it the nightclubs, prostitution joints and spas are mushrooming especially in Cheras and Puchong?”

Ahmad: “Hmmm, kalau bagi PR jadi federal government, bolehkah mereka berubah kesemua gejala dan kelemahan sistem kerajaan? Bolehkah mereka hapuskan rasuah dengan efektif? Adakah secara keseluruhan PR mempunyai pemimpin yang layak dan berpengalaman untuk memajukan negara kita? Kenapa sehingga hari ini PR tidak mampu mengiatkan ’shadow ministers’ mereka masing-masing untuk memantau setiap kementerian kerajaan? Ini satu dilemma juga bagi PR. So the question is pihak manakah yang harus kita boleh diharapkan? Risiko terhadap menyokong PR yang lebih bersih, transparent dan beramanah tetapi tidak berpengalaman dan berkemungkinan akan bertengkar seperti di Selangor atau mengharapkan BN benar-benar bertaubat dan membangunkan negara demi rakyat dengan keikhlasan”. Satu soalan yang mesti difikirkan dengan matang bukan setakat membaca mass media atau Malaysiakini atau websites/blogs politik.

—————————————–

PR: “The ISA is a draconian law, no more relevant in our society today. It is obviously violating the principles of human rights. The government want to maintain it to suppress their political opponent”.

BN: “If the opposition has done nothing wrong, why are they fearful of the Act? A nation like ours cannot be just talking about human rights only as the paramount consideration should be peace and stability. Thanks God, so far we manage to control and prevent any terrorism and extremism act unlike our neighbouring country. There is no way to give a single chance for those idiots to mess up the country. However the government realises there is a need to update the law which is why we will soon table a review of the Act”.

Raju: “A balance of security and freedoms, which is more important?”

Fabian: “I agree human rights is one thing, peace is another important factor to consider. What about justice, fairness and abuse? Abolish the ISA and replace it with Anti-Terrorism Act”.

————————————————————

PR: “There are certain matters need to be confidential for the sake of the people. We cannot simply declassify those minutes and documents as we feel it is not in the interest of the state government to do so”. (Lim Guan Eng and Ronnie Liu)

BN: “No comment. Now they know it is not easy to govern.”

Ah Kau: “Apalah dulu semasa berkempen, LGE dan bapa, Khalid Ibrahim begitu agresif menentang OSA, sekarang cakap tak serupa bikin!”

Ali: “Kan I sudah cakap, semua ahli politik itu sama je, cannot trust them fully. We can just be observant by judging their actions regardless of which party they are from. Apa yang saya takut adalah bayangkan kalau next election salah satu pihak hanya menang dengan tipis untuk jadi federal government, macam-macam boleh terjadi – by then jahanamlah negara kita!”

——————————————————

PR: “Racial or sectarian politics is no more relevant in our society today. We are all Malaysia Malaysians!”

BN: “1Malaysia. Malaysians must be tolerance and understanding the need of our diversity”

Rosman: “1Malaysia atau Bangsa Malaysia itu cosmetic saja. Sementara ini tak mungkin mana-mana pihak, parti atau pemimpin boleh benar-benar menghapuskan mentaliti 100% tak kira bangsa dan ugama. Itu adalah satu kebenaran yang tidak boleh dinafikan. Kalau nak cerita pasal isu ini, 3 hari 3 malam pun tak habis kerana melibatkan sejarah, adat, kepercayaan, DEB dll. Oleh itu paling penting adalah politicians tertentu harus dihukum jika didapati sengaja memainkan sentimen kebencian di antara kaum dan bangsa di dalam masyarakat majmuk kita. Memang tidak ada masalah sebenarnya untuk kita semua bersama mahupun di tempat kerja, sukan, kedai mamak dan kejiranan”.

Ah Meng: “Ya tak ya jugak, hanya segolongan individu dan ahli politik sahaja yang ekstreme dan mahu cari hal tanpa bervisi dan mementingkan negara, celaka betul mereka ini!”.

The Wonders of IT

Count Your Blessings

Feel like giving up? Life is unfair? Listen to this: