Disinformation, lies, fear and propaganda.  We need to know how to distinguish the above terms, the more so when the general election is around the corner.  Personally I consider it as part of the democracy process where we are free to campaign or promote our political affiliation in order to win.  What disturbs me most is some politicians are fond of creating lies and causing fear among the people.  Metaphors or speculation such as our country is going to bankrupt soon and the anti-government or policies perception.

So whether and to what degree these terms overlap is subject to debate. Some define propaganda as the use of non-rational arguments to either advance or undermine a political ideal, and use disinformation as an alternative name for undermining propaganda. Others consider them to be separate concepts altogether. One popular distinction holds that disinformation also describes politically motivated messaging designed explicitly to engender public cynicism, uncertainty, apathy, distrust, and paranoia, all of which disincentivize citizen engagement and mobilization for social or political change. Lies, meanwhile, generally refers to the inadvertent sharing of false information.

Generally disinformation is always purposeful and not necessarily composed of outright lies or fabrications. It can be composed of mostly true facts, stripped of context or blended with falsehoods to support the intended message, and is always part of a larger plan or agenda.

Whatever it is, we cannot accept it as an inevitable part of the political life in Malaysia be it from BN or DAP or PKR.  It is high time we need to practise sincere politics.


The Laws and Reality on Disinformation, Propaganda and GE14.

Like it or not we have a democratically elected government (otherwise no point for having politicians from both side to contest in an election).  As we are facing the 14th General Election, one can reasonably expect to be fed with all sorts of information be it real or fake. Generally we read or watch and believe what is in the mainstream or social medias. Expect a lot of cliches, but when it comes to a lie-filled media, if you/they are not part of the solution, then you/they are truly part of the problem.

Politicians and candidates (maybe not the expired ones) refer to methods which essentially include:

– Cross-linking patterns between media sources offer a view of authority and prominence within the media world.

– The sharing of media sources by users on Whatsapp, Instagram, Wechat, Twitter and Facebook provides a broader perspective on the role and influence of media sources among people engaged in politics through their laptops or handphones.

– The differential media sharing patterns of BN or PH supporters on the social medias enable a detailed analysis of the role of partisanship in the formation and function of media structures.

– Content analysis using automated tools supports the tracking of topics over time among media sources; some call it the big data to strategise their respective winning formula. Qualitative media analysis of individual case studies enhances our understanding of media function and structure.  Some use it to distract or exploit or politicise an issue from the data for own political gain.

The above methods serve no purpose or will be in futile if the information is biased, misinformed or fake.   Above all what the people or the politicians are concern most is reliability of the information or news received, read and heard. Some have used such information as a weapon for millennia, to boost their support and quash dissidence. The word “fake news’ is hardly a term before GE12 but now some see it as one of the greatest threat to democracy, free debate and political maturity.

Ideally journalist, reporter, keyboard warrior, cybertrooper, blogger or politician are responsible to play a role to tackle false or fake news, in disseminating information and to correct any negative perceptions.  But it is unlikely due to partisanship.

In Malaysia the relevant laws include Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission Act 1998 and Sedition Act 1948 (perhaps Defamation Act 1957 for civil suit) are there for the authorities to monitor and take action against offences relating to online or social medias.  Personally I do not think these legislation offer adequate protection or are sufficient to combat and prevent irresponsible parties to spread slanderous, malicious, fake and seditious information/news.

These laws may need to be amended to criminalising what could be classed an innocent but silly behaviour, such as belligerent posts on FB, Twitter, Whatsapp, WeChat and Instagram.  Equally it does not go far enough so as to offer any protection against the publication of false stories.  Fake news will only fall under the remit of this act if it is grossly offensive; any misinformation which is not offensive but is simply untrue will slip through the net.

However there is an inherent risk of infringing freedom of speech and the freedom of the press if new laws are introduced, but this must be balanced against the ease with which information/news can be published.   Some also argued that any fight against the offensive or fake news is a  pretext to censorship or a propanganda.  Some suggested to follow what the China’s government did as to ban FB, Google and Whatsapp in the country.

One may argue that the rakyats today are no more so foolish or innocence to believe whatever they read or see but regrettably some are.  As technology advances, the law must adapt to ensure that it provides an adequate remedy for victims of defamatory allegations, fake news and hoaxes, whether or not these stories are offensive, with the intention to bring down a democratically-elected government or have caused serious harm or financial loss.

The more immediate challenge lies within the availability of resources to effectively monitor publishers of misinformation, and to provide an effective deterrent against the fake news stories which have been increasingly circulated throughout the last couple of years.

At the end of the day, sometimes there can be a little truth of fake news.  Hence as I always tell my family and friends:  “Dont believe it blindly, verify please!”



As Gerakan coordinator for Parlimen Bukit Bendera together with sdrs Chee Wey Hng (Gerakan coordinator for DUN Tanjung Bunga), Jason Loo Jieh Sheng (Gerakan coordinator for DUN Pulau Tikus) & Ooi Zhi Yi (Gerakan coordinator for DUN Kebun Bunga), we will dedicate our heart & soul to serve and work for the betterment of the people and party without fear or favour.  May the year of 2018 will be a great start for us.



Kesedaran politik anak muda harus dipupuk



KUALA LUMPUR: Majoriti pengundi muda berbangsa Cina dijangka mungkin memboikot pilihan raya umum (PRU) akan datang kerana mereka tidak percaya mengundi akan membawa sebarang perubahan, seorang pemimpin Gerakan memberitahu sebuah forum malam tadi.

Timbalan Ketua Pemuda Gerakan, Andy Yong anak muda Cina pada ketika ini lebih berminat menumpukan kepada soal mencari rezeki.

“Bagi mereka, tidak ada perbezaan sama ada keluar mengundi atau tidak, ia kerana sebarang keputusan memihak Barisan Nasional (BN) atau Pakatan Harapan (PH) tidak akan bawa perubahan,” katanya pada forum “Anak Muda Boikot PRU14?” di Dewan Perhimpunan Cina Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor (KLSCAH), malam tadi.

Statistik menunjukkan lebih 4.1 juta rakyat Malaysia yang layak mengundi masih belum mendaftar sebagai pengundi pada PRU depan. Menurut Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR), daripada jumlah itu, majoriti adalah golongan muda berusia sekitar bawah 30 tahun.

Andy tidak menolak kemungkinan trend yang berlaku pada pengundi muda berbangsa Cina akan menjangkiti pengundi muda berbangsa Melayu.

Katanya, adalah sukar menarik minat anak muda.

“Sukar pengaruhi anak muda untuk mendaftar mengundi. Sering saya ditanya anak muda, apa yang mereka akan dapat jika mengundi.”

Katanya, masih ada anak muda memiliki idealisme dan mahukan perubahan, “tetapi hanya minoriti”.

Beware of fake news in social medias…


My recent experience reaffirms the potential dangers and damages that could occur due to spinned or twisted messages/comments and fake news. It can be economically, socially and of course politically destructive.

A professional foreign social-media analyst told me in America there are hubs for conspiracy theories and fake stories. Websites such as Centre for Research for Globalisation, Cernovich and Infowars (funded by George Soros) are some classic examples. Hmm…perhaps this is something where the Opposition has looked into years ago.

We need to understand the revolution that has taken place in information and communication, which has completely upended the traditional world. Much has been written about this new media landscape that has made news and information available to everyone round the clock, turned mainstream media business on its head, removed the traditional gatekeepers of information and made authorities everywhere more accountable for their words and action than ever before.

But, the more profound effect has been on how people consume and respond to news and information. They no longer do so passively, but want to be active participants, posting and reposting them to their social circles, acting as gatekeepers. They become active filters, deciding what to pass on and what to suppress depending on their interests and biases.

I am glad that the federal government has realised this few months ago. Though necessary actions and policies are required, there is always a need to balance so that our fundamental liberties are not violated.

So guys do verify or take it with a pinch of salt in whatever news, messages, videos and pictures we received in wassapp, wechat, fb etc.


Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑