Skip to content

Look at the capability and ability not race…

04/12/2016

3fbfc9eca00b8f564175c3dd6a7a5bee

Malaysia is an unique and colourful nation, it is our asset.

All human beings are born equal, regardless of race, but races are not equal.

Don’t get me wrong, I am not specifically talking about Malays or any other races but in general.

But I also know that many of you are confused by the examples and counter-examples that bombard your mind especially by politicians.

You are being told not to be racist, but you feel that something is not right; things are different from the media and political propaganda. You see Malaysia PM Najib on the news and television, but you also face the reality every day when you walk on the street, when you take your kids from school or when you go to work. You simply know that some streets, neighborhoods, organisations or even cities, dominated by certain races.

So, the signals we receive about racial equality are conflicting and it seems like we stand in front a paradox, isn’t it? Only in appearance. The answer to this problem is a little tricky: all human beings are equal, regardless of race, but races are not equal.

Put fear, self-interest, inferiority and hypocrisy aside and look at a larger picture.

First and foremost I have to say that we will not talk about the superior or inferior spirituality of the human races.

The issue of racial equality will be analyzed only with the help of common sense and a minimum of scientific, historical and statistical data. Yes, many of the numbers and data used are still in debate and you may find slightly different values, depending on the sources, but try to be visionary especially having to live in a multi-religious/racial society.

What is racism? Racism, or racialism, basically, refers to the unfounded idea that some races of people are superior to other races of people. Racist behavior is not a recent phenomenon and it is not characteristic only to the white race. It has manifested ever since human races began to interact with each other because racism has chiefly a psychological cause. I think we can agree that racism is not about skin color, but in fact about the mental impact of the skin color. Without a proper education and without knowing the person who looks different, the natural tendency of any person is to adopt a cautious (or different) behavior in relation to those very different from themselves. Our instincts tell us that the people who are physically different from us and the group we are part of might be dangerous (they might carry a disease or they might have a dangerous way of thinking) or they might have a weakness. So, throughout the world’s history conquerors enslaved the conquered, while skin color gave birth to all kinds of theories, mainly religious, about the differences between people.

Our current racial policies should not has anything to do with superiority or ownership or being the majority but has everything to do with politics and history.

Hence for goodness sake, remarks such as “balik Tongshan” or “balik Indon” or “balik India” should not be of any relevance anymore.

Racial equality is a trend, a way of thought, like feudalism, monarchism, astrology, papal power or communism. But no trend stops itself peacefully, because those who are the exponents or the beneficiaries of an order of things do anything possible to maintain that order. The first who oppose any trend suffer: they are marginalized, ignored, punished or even killed. The elites – whether we speak about politicians, stars, intellectuals or scientists – avoid telling the truth so as not to lose the benefits they obtained. No one is willing to give up his titles, his money, his status, the respect he enjoys, his numbers of voters, his privileges for which he worked for years and ultimately to endanger his person and his family, only to admit truths against the established order. Besides, it is easy to defend any kind of ideology when you stand in an ivory tower.

Racial tensions have manifested in our past and will continue to manifest predominantly in the future, where there is no equal treatment or base on meritocracy. Time and the current policies will not bring racial harmony, although the entertainment and sport industries try to convince us otherwise.

The ideal of meritocracy and the ideal of racial equality are conflicting.

Many developed nations have been built on the ideal of meritocracy. This means that all people, regardless of the familial or cultural background, race, gender or wealth have the right to fight in the social competition from equal positions. The difference between the individuals is made only by personal abilities, power of work, level of intelligence and knowledge. All institutions and organizations from within a state – whether we talk about schools, colleges or private companies – act as a sort of social filters. They put people in competition with each other in order to identify the valuable ones and use their potential. Accordingly, valuable people enjoy material and social benefits and the chance to advance further. Through this process of supporting and promoting values, society as a whole evolves and wins an improvement in living conditions.

Meritocracy is the best social and political system ever invented. The problem is that the ideal of meritocracy and the ideal of racial equality are conflicting. And, if some people especially politicians continue to promote a faulty racial policy, exactly this meritocracy is endangered.

Some racial minorities do the easiest things they can do: they blame the outside for their failure, blame the racism of the Malays or Chinese (in terms of economy dominance), they perceive society as being built against them and they protest. In reaction, in order to maintain public order and not lose votes, politicians and media make compromises in favor of racial minorities.

As a result sometimes racial minorities began to be overprotected and advantaged, which in turn creates frustration and anger in the majority race, and ultimately to an increase of social tension. This is how problems escalate and become uncontrollable destructive phenomena.

We have the right to understand the causes of the phenomena that surround us and affect our lives. It is nobody’s fault that nature is cruel and favors some groups of people in the detriment of others. But it is entirely our fault if we do not speak the truth. When people are afraid of speaking the truth, then there is something wrong with the society they live in. That is for sure. Lying will bring nothing good. Today’s social context teaches the children of the racial minorities only one thing: whatever bad things are happening to them is because they are discriminated; they have no guilt. What they really have to learn is exactly the opposite: they have to work harder to overcome their condition. But this thing is not possible as long as society promotes an ideology contrary to the truth.

We can continue to lie to ourselves about this issue and search for all sorts of explanations for the social and economic differences between races. But this will not bring the balance society needs and will surely not bring any long-term benefit. How long will the racist card be played? Reality cannot be ignored indefinitely, no matter what.

And the longer we perpetuate this state of lie, the harder the inevitable change will be and will claim more sacrifices on all sides.

Yes, it’s about justice for Indira Ghandi…

30/11/2016

img_20161130_091635

This morning while holding a watching brief for Indira Ghandi’s appeal at the Federal Court, I was impressed with the presiding Chief Judge of Malaya Honourable Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin’s remarks that the case before him is about justice and not Islam as he rebutted the Respondent’s counsel. His Lordship even said although 4 of them on the bench are Muslims, they are more concerned with the law and fairness. Kudos! That should be the way …

Hopefully the Federal Court will decide “untheocratically” in Indira’s appeal.

14/11/2016

20161114_120925

Meanwhile, Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia Deputy Youth Chief, Advocate Andy Yong was also present as he held a watching brief on behalf of Gerakan’s appeal for Indira.

According to Andy, Ridhuan’s whereabouts are unknown at the moment as this proves to be the biggest challenge in presenting Prasana in court.

“Even his own lawyer does not know where he is at the moment, he is absconded with contempt of court.

“The welfare of the child (Prasana) is the paramount issue involving this case, Ridhuan has yet to present the child in all these years and no one knows how she is doing,” Andy told TMT.

Will Indira’s converted husband appear in court tomorrow? | The Malaysian Times

Will Indira’s converted husband appear in court tomorrow?

Meritocracy is the way to move forward

05/11/2016

Screenshot_20161105-103357.png

 

Gerakan Youth deputy chief Andy Yong says it is time the country values meritocracy and hard work over race, including on the appointment of key positions.

“Today, after so many years of independence does it still make sense to have racial policy or convention as a central basis for high positions such as the chief justice, attorney-general and inspector-general of police?

“It is high time in order for us to move forward progressively. We must truly value meritocracy and hard work,” he said in a statement last night.

Doing so, Yong said, would mean true progress as we could achieve this without compromising our ethnic and religious identities.

He noted that it was more challenging for Malaysia which had chosen a different approach to the western concept of a melting pot.

“This mosaic approach is clearly more challenging than the melting-pot approach adopted by the western countries, but it was a choice that we made as a people, and we persevered to make it happen.”

He added that when our instincts are centred on race and religion, non-discrimination rules and policies are needed to facilitate peaceful cohabitation, provide a sense of security to minorities and to enhance cultural ties.

“This is when the harmony policy comes into play, for example the proposed National Harmony Act, with the objective of building a cohesive society, while still allowing Malaysians to preserve the ethnic-religious basis of their identities.”

Yong said as a society it was important to acknowledge that we wanted the best to lead in both the private and public sectors.

“All institutions and organisations from within our country such as schools, government departments, judiciary or private companies act as a sort of social filters.

“We must put people in competition with each other in order to identify the valuable ones and use their potential.

“I strongly believe meritocracy will be the best social and political system,” he said.

Stability of the country should be the paramount consideration; not Red or Yellow

01/11/2016

Bersih insisted they will proceed with their gathering on 19 November and the Reds want to counter it.

It is obvious one of the main reason Yellows or Reds want to demonstrate publicly is the impact of it.

It is only then any violent or unwarranted incidents will be conspicuous and attract medias attention. Doing it in a stadium or enclosed areas will not have such impact.

Although I do support peaceful assembly as provided under the laws; violent acts or action that caused hatred and disharmony is a big no.

Hence the police should clamp down not only the Yellows but the Reds.  It is proven in the past by demonstrating openly in the public, no one can guarantee a peaceful gathering especially when there is provocation.

There are many ways to skin a cat, aggressive behaviour should not be one of it.

Certain parties want to see blood; this is so when they are provoked. All it takes is a spark of fire, worst if an agent provocateur who intentionally caused it.

So it is no more a question of democratic rights or liberty; it is about stability of the country.

 

针对即将在11月19日举行的净选盟5.0大集会,以及近日红衫军反集会发起人拿督嘉马尤诺斯宣布将在独立广场、吉隆坡国际机场、吉隆坡第二国际机场、布城及默布草场展开机会,并将对净选盟的任何“没教养之举”以牙还牙一事,民青团署理团长杨锦成表示关注。他认为,尽管大集会可能引发暴力冲突事件,净选盟和红衫军仍坚持在公开场所举办大集会,而非在封闭场所或体育馆,当中主要的目的就是为了达到集会效果。他说只有通过在公开场所举办大集会,当中发生的暴力突发事件才会变得显著并引起各界关注,而在封闭体育馆并不会达到如此效果。

 

同时也是职业律师的杨锦成指出,尽管他支持2012年和平集会法令下所允许的和平集会,但却无法同意任何可能挑起仇恨和不和谐的暴力行为。他说,过往的经验指出在公开场所举行大集会或示威活动往往将引发暴力冲突事件,它无法保证和平集会中不发生挑衅和暴力冲突事件。他也举列,早前红黄双方已经在多场造势活动中气氛紧张,并发生冲突。有鉴于早前例子,尽管警方已经表示不会禁止该集会,杨锦成希望警方可以一视同仁,不只是取缔净选盟,同时也应该采取相同行动制止红衫军。

 

“显然,双方都希望在这次的集会中看到血流事件,以博取廉价宣传,尤其经过多番挑衅和蓄意煽动后,任何小火花都可能是暴力冲突的导火线。因此,我希望双方可以冷静并抑制情绪,避免紧张升温。红黄集会都有潜在风险引发暴力冲突事件,双方应考虑大众安全及国家利益,停止举办集会。”

 

杨锦成表示,任何对国家的体制感到不满的一方可以通过许多更和平以及合法的管道提出具有建设性的意见和反映不满,而不是通过街头示威等暴力宣泄的方式表达不满。这对国家的形象和健康发展是弊多于利的。

Stop Corruption Once & For All !

19/10/2016

‘Mini casinos’ operating freely in the heart of KL | Free Malaysia Today

‘Mini casinos’ operating freely in the heart of KL

I refer to this article where it is reported that the authorities are oblivious to it and powerless to act against them.

Many of us on the ground are well aware that such activities are rampant and have been operating for years. Not only “mini casinos” but prostitution, illegal money-lending/betting, ecstasy pills etc are also widespread.

Ask most Malaysians why there is no end to such vice and illegal activities (esp from the urban), they will tell you due to bribery and corruption.

Yes, corruption is always the problem.  Many businessmen, developers and ordinary rakyats are immune to such practice. Some are in favour of it so long as their interest is protected or secured.  So it is not an issue of “powerless” or “oblivious”.

And stop saying it is only a few bad apples.

Though Bernama today reported a fall of 0.8% crime rate in our country, the authorities do not want to admit the seriousness of other criminal activities.

Yes, I believe the underworld societies are still very much in play today though we want to become a developed nation. They kautim the authorities etc.

High time for the relevant authorities especially MACC to curb and investigate such menace in order for our country to move forward. MACC has done a good job over the last one year but we know it is not enough.

I strongly believe something can be done to clean up Malaysia if they have the will to do so.  But if certain parties believe corruption is part of the system, how do we expect a transformation?  Why do you think it is important for them to win election?

If Hadi succeeds in pushing through Pas Hudud, we’ll challenge it again.

12/10/2016