The Laws and Reality on Disinformation, Propaganda and GE14.

Like it or not we have a democratically elected government (otherwise no point for having politicians from both side to contest in an election).  As we are facing the 14th General Election, one can reasonably expect to be fed with all sorts of information be it real or fake. Generally we read or watch and believe what is in the mainstream or social medias. Expect a lot of cliches, but when it comes to a lie-filled media, if you/they are not part of the solution, then you/they are truly part of the problem.

Politicians and candidates (maybe not the expired ones) refer to methods which essentially include:

– Cross-linking patterns between media sources offer a view of authority and prominence within the media world.

– The sharing of media sources by users on Whatsapp, Instagram, Wechat, Twitter and Facebook provides a broader perspective on the role and influence of media sources among people engaged in politics through their laptops or handphones.

– The differential media sharing patterns of BN or PH supporters on the social medias enable a detailed analysis of the role of partisanship in the formation and function of media structures.

– Content analysis using automated tools supports the tracking of topics over time among media sources; some call it the big data to strategise their respective winning formula. Qualitative media analysis of individual case studies enhances our understanding of media function and structure.  Some use it to distract or exploit or politicise an issue from the data for own political gain.

The above methods serve no purpose or will be in futile if the information is biased, misinformed or fake.   Above all what the people or the politicians are concern most is reliability of the information or news received, read and heard. Some have used such information as a weapon for millennia, to boost their support and quash dissidence. The word “fake news’ is hardly a term before GE12 but now some see it as one of the greatest threat to democracy, free debate and political maturity.

Ideally journalist, reporter, keyboard warrior, cybertrooper, blogger or politician are responsible to play a role to tackle false or fake news, in disseminating information and to correct any negative perceptions.  But it is unlikely due to partisanship.

In Malaysia the relevant laws include Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission Act 1998 and Sedition Act 1948 (perhaps Defamation Act 1957 for civil suit) are there for the authorities to monitor and take action against offences relating to online or social medias.  Personally I do not think these legislation offer adequate protection or are sufficient to combat and prevent irresponsible parties to spread slanderous, malicious, fake and seditious information/news.

These laws may need to be amended to criminalising what could be classed an innocent but silly behaviour, such as belligerent posts on FB, Twitter, Whatsapp, WeChat and Instagram.  Equally it does not go far enough so as to offer any protection against the publication of false stories.  Fake news will only fall under the remit of this act if it is grossly offensive; any misinformation which is not offensive but is simply untrue will slip through the net.

However there is an inherent risk of infringing freedom of speech and the freedom of the press if new laws are introduced, but this must be balanced against the ease with which information/news can be published.   Some also argued that any fight against the offensive or fake news is a  pretext to censorship or a propanganda.  Some suggested to follow what the China’s government did as to ban FB, Google and Whatsapp in the country.

One may argue that the rakyats today are no more so foolish or innocence to believe whatever they read or see but regrettably some are.  As technology advances, the law must adapt to ensure that it provides an adequate remedy for victims of defamatory allegations, fake news and hoaxes, whether or not these stories are offensive, with the intention to bring down a democratically-elected government or have caused serious harm or financial loss.

The more immediate challenge lies within the availability of resources to effectively monitor publishers of misinformation, and to provide an effective deterrent against the fake news stories which have been increasingly circulated throughout the last couple of years.

At the end of the day, sometimes there can be a little truth of fake news.  Hence as I always tell my family and friends:  “Dont believe it blindly, verify please!”


Featured post

Crimes that BN government failed to tackle effectively

Part2 –


A nationwide spike in shooting incidents signals a worrying trend.

Recently again we read or heard about two shooting incidents: one in Penang and a gun-armed robbery in Johor. This is not something new. Some of us are aware that it is not hard to hire a hitman or purchase/rent a gun in Malaysia. Armed banditry and criminal violence is something that the previous government failed to tackle effectively. It doesnt takes a rocket scientist to know what is the cause of it and how the criminals obtained such firearms. Simply put it is due to corruption and ineffective enforcement (especially at the border of Thailand) to stop smuggling of the firearms.

Typically, the individuals who use firearms to commit violent crimes are not the initial lawful purchasers, but have instead obtained firearms through an illicit (black) market (be it from Thailand or Indonesia or within Malaysia).

There are two Acts that control possession of guns: The Arms Act (1960) and The Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act (1971). It is relatively well regulated.

Therefore it is important to trace the source of crime guns. Routine tracing of firearms recovered from criminals is key to the effective enforcement. Those trace data can be used by law enforcement to identify dealers who sell or supply a disproportionate number of crime guns. These people can then be subjected to heightened scrutiny. Individual traffickers can also be identified through trace data.

It is also equally important to identify the points along the border used by syndicates to smuggle in guns. This can be found at the Thai or Kalimantan border and not forgetting the southern side where boats are coming from Indonesia.

Our enforcement authorities need to be more effective to curb gun smuggling. So are strict policies to be implemented to enhance accountability and thereby prevent violent injury and death and more importantly to live in a safe and peaceful country.

New Beginning for Malaysia

Part 1: Change that is unlikely to happen if BN continue to rule –


Education is important for a country to grow, in fact it is the most important criteria. Whether it is economically or socially, education plays a vital role in the growth of these two important factors.

Now the government has re-established a single ministry. Kudos to that, no more bureaucracy.

Next we need to understand that education must be secular and free from political and religious interference. There should be academic freedom such as students’ self-government and return of universities autonomy (to revisit UUCA).

They should re-look at the quota system or make university enrolment or award public scholarship more meritocratic.

Same goes to the employment and promotion of academicians.

Once the above is achieved, vernacular schools must consider an under one roof system in order to promote national integration.



Jangan mudah percaya. Jangan mudah diperbodohkan. Dont be easily manipulated. Dalam hari dan minggu yang akan datang, kita akan terima pelbagai dan banyak video, mesej & gambar bagi tujuan menarik undi.

I reiterate, in days to come we will receive more and more of fake, hatred & provoking videos and messages etc. All they want is to create hatred. Shout and jeer at ceramah. Our social medias will be flooded with negative and unsubstantiated information. Yes it may be enjoyable to watch or hear but they should really talk about the welfare of the people and betterment of the nation with real facts. Dont get me wrong, I am not referring to a specific party, any political party would do the above.

Therefore vote wisely. Vote for the right candidate and not blindly for the party. Make our own evaluation, research and think rationally.  Thank you.

Dont Let Go



最近看了一个动漫片《Coco》 ,讲述了人们对于死亡的认知。当世界上没有一个人再思念你的时候,你才是真正的死去消亡。所以我们每一个人都永远都会活在别人的记忆中。
可是在今天的打枪铺,却有这样一群老人,虽然活着,却几乎被世人遗忘了。他们是几乎提前被世界宣告死亡的一群人…..其中一位几乎被世人遗忘的老太婆(Chin Guat Kee)85岁是位常年没有家人陪伴、也无人造访的老人。她几乎与世隔绝,再加上行动不便,只能常年待在家里和靠一些好心的邻居偶尔送碳帮忙梳洗。我真担心她突然有一天消失了会怎么样呢。。。

Sometimes we live in a world where people are denied their rights, simply because of their age.
One cannot escape noticing there are many elderly citizens living at Rifle Range flats in Penang. In any situation, there is always service and helpful hands in need when it comes to the elderly. I have recently met Madam Chin Guat Kee, aged 85 living alone. She lives on social welfare subsidy of RM300 a month. She is unable to walk without assistance hence spent the Chinese New Year in her small flat by herself. She needs help and encouragement. I know many are facing the similar situation.
The smallest, simplest things can make a person’s day easier and happier. Dont let go…



Disinformation, lies, fear and propaganda.  We need to know how to distinguish the above terms, the more so when the general election is around the corner.  Personally I consider it as part of the democracy process where we are free to campaign or promote our political affiliation in order to win.  What disturbs me most is some politicians are fond of creating lies and causing fear among the people.  Metaphors or speculation such as our country is going to bankrupt soon and the anti-government or policies perception.

So whether and to what degree these terms overlap is subject to debate. Some define propaganda as the use of non-rational arguments to either advance or undermine a political ideal, and use disinformation as an alternative name for undermining propaganda. Others consider them to be separate concepts altogether. One popular distinction holds that disinformation also describes politically motivated messaging designed explicitly to engender public cynicism, uncertainty, apathy, distrust, and paranoia, all of which disincentivize citizen engagement and mobilization for social or political change. Lies, meanwhile, generally refers to the inadvertent sharing of false information.

Generally disinformation is always purposeful and not necessarily composed of outright lies or fabrications. It can be composed of mostly true facts, stripped of context or blended with falsehoods to support the intended message, and is always part of a larger plan or agenda.

Whatever it is, we cannot accept it as an inevitable part of the political life in Malaysia be it from BN or DAP or PKR.  It is high time we need to practise sincere politics.

Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑